Can carbon dating false
C atoms (the neutron is accepted and a proton is ejected from the nucleus). Many accept radiometric dating methods as proof that the earth is millions of years old, in contrast to the biblical timeline.We can use scientific techniques in the present, combined with assumptions about historical events, to estimate the age.Therefore, there are several assumptions that must be made in radioisotope dating.By estimating how fast the sand is falling and measuring the amount of sand at the bottom, we could calculate how much time has elapsed since the hourglass was turned over.All our calculations could be correct (observational science), but the result could be wrong.Dating methods must also rely on another kind of science called historical science. Determining the conditions present when a rock first formed can only be studied through historical science.Determining how the environment might have affected a rock also falls under historical science. Since radioisotope dating uses both types of science, we can’t directly measure the age of something.
There appears to be a fundamental conflict between the Bible and the reported ages given by radioisotope dating.The following table is a sample of different element half-lives.Scientists use observational science to measure the amount of a daughter element within a rock sample and to determine the present observable decay rate of the parent element.Since God is the Creator of all things (including science), and His Word is true (“), the true age of the earth must agree with His Word.However, rather than accept the biblical account of creation, many Christians have accepted the radioisotope dates of billions of years and attempted to fit long ages into the Bible.